John McEnroe’s 30-Year Vendetta Against Tennis Officials Continues…and It’s Still Stupid

Posted on Updated on

Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in.

After agonizing through yet another clay-court season where the misinformed and hard-headed among us bemoaned the lack of Hawkeye and the competence of the world’s leading tennis officials, I thought I was home free for another year.

Then, John McEnroe opened his mouth.  Again.

As reported by Simon Chambers at The Tennis Space, the seven-time Grand Slam champion again confirmed that 30 years has done little to quiet his disdain for officials in a pre-Wimbledon chat with British journalists. Despite repeatedly showcasing his ignorance about the rules as both a player and commentator, and today’s players also showing a lack of understanding of the regulations that govern their sport, McEnroe asserted (and not for the first time) that getting rid of officials entirely would drum up interest in tennis.

Q: You want to get rid of all the officials?
A: Yes. Do away with them altogether.

Q: It is possible in this day and age?
A: That’s what I’m saying. You want a little edge so if you had no umpires but you had a challenge system, obviously it would have to be on every court, that goes without saying. But you’d have a system where the players would call their own lines and all of a sudden things would get a whole lot edgier. But you could challenge it. And then there could be like… say the guy was like blatantly – you think – cheating and you challenge and it’s right, people would be like “boo!”, you know, people would get way more into it. And then you’d be like ‘see this guy? This guy is such a cheater!”. It would be unbelievable for tennis, I promise you. The problem is, there’s no way in hell they’ll do it. But I guarantee you that tennis would be like 30 per cent more interesting.

There are so many things wrong here, but the biggest issue I have with McEnroe’s comments (shockingly) doesn’t have anything to do with officials at all. An all-time great of our sport is essentially saying that it’s not interesting enough and needs to resort to cheap gimmicks to just make itself relevant and entertaining. Does he not realize how ridiculous that sounds? Imagine if Michael Jordan said the NBA should get rid of referees and Lebron James should be required to call his own travels. Or how about if Pete Rose said MLB players should call their own strike zones? The sport would turn into a farce faster than McEnroe himself could spell ‘umpire.’ That’s supposed to be a good thing for the sport?

We’ve reached a point in McEnroe’s existence where most (myself included) can no longer discern if he actually believes what he says anymore. He’s been cashing in on the same schtick for decades now, and it’s certainly extended well beyond self-parody.

As the first day of play at the All England Club came to a close on Monday, Ernests Gulbis, no stranger himself to outlandish opinions and controversy, disagreed with McEnroe’s comments. After an amusing exchange with a reporter in which he thought McEnroe wanted to remove “vampires,” the Latvian said: “Without umpires, it wouldn’t work.”

When even Ernests Gulbis is disagreeing with you, it might be time to reexamine yourself just a tad.

About these ads

6 thoughts on “John McEnroe’s 30-Year Vendetta Against Tennis Officials Continues…and It’s Still Stupid

    Cheryl Collins said:
    June 24, 2014 at 8:41 am

    Astute commentary, once again!

    Tennis Fan said:
    June 29, 2014 at 12:29 pm

    Since you don’t believe in the science of hawkeye (heck, you probably deny climate change) your post doesn’t surprise. If you could examine your brain, you’d realize that your love for umpires prevents you from logical thought. Mac makes a valid point. Was also echoed by Agassi in his book “Open”

      VC responded:
      June 29, 2014 at 12:37 pm

      I couldn’t care less about what he actually said – the point is, an all-time great of the sport is saying tennis isn’t interesting enough on its own, and needs to resort to cheap, headline-making gimmicks to pull in more eyeballs. It’s disrespectful to everyone who is playing right now, and we’re *certainly* not short of good stories in tennis currently.

      You seemingly agree with that perspective, but you sign your comment as “Tennis Fan.” That makes sense.

    Tennis Fan said:
    June 29, 2014 at 12:49 pm

    You “don’t care what he said” yet you devoted a post to it. Yes, I’m a tennis fan, but the worst part of tennis is the mediocre high chair types that rule over the best at (what I consider) the best sport in our world. The juniors call their own lines, so why not have the pro’s do that as well, along with technology (that you don’t believe in ) to allow for challenges. I’m guessing that you dream of sitting in that high chair and changing the fate of a world class tennis match.

      VC responded:
      June 29, 2014 at 12:54 pm

      We can sit here all day if you’re going to repeatedly ignore my actual point. Cheers.

        Tennis Fan said:
        June 29, 2014 at 1:03 pm

        Mac’s point was that highchair types and lines people can be eff’d with (he made a career of it). And that tennis would be better if it focused on the players. As I tennis fan, I remember as many matches that were corrupted by bad officiating as I remember great play. Let the players try and hook the calls. Let their opponents use (world class) technology to call them out. Excellence would be restored.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s